human cd9 alexa fluor 488 conjugated antibody (R&D Systems)
Structured Review
![Graphical representation of workflow for isolation and characterization of Plasma-derived EVs ( A ). Characterization of isolated EVs through transmission electron microscopy ( B ), Scale bar= 100 nm; and confocal microscopy ( C ), Scale bar= 20 μm. Nanoparticle Analysis (NTA) showing the size distribution of EVs (nm) and particle concentration (particle/ml) ( D ); Western blot of EVs markers <t>(CD9,</t> CD63, CD81, Tsg101) and protein co-isolate (Apolipoprotein-B) where Plasma (P) and F [ – ] = SEC Fractions collected ( E )](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_2553/pmc13072553/pmc13072553__13195_2026_2028_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
Human Cd9 Alexa Fluor 488 Conjugated Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human cd9 alexa fluor 488 conjugated antibody/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 6 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Stress-induced alteration of small extracellular vesicles drives amyloid-beta sequestration and exacerbates Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis"
Article Title: Stress-induced alteration of small extracellular vesicles drives amyloid-beta sequestration and exacerbates Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis
Journal: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
doi: 10.1186/s13195-026-02028-1
Figure Legend Snippet: Graphical representation of workflow for isolation and characterization of Plasma-derived EVs ( A ). Characterization of isolated EVs through transmission electron microscopy ( B ), Scale bar= 100 nm; and confocal microscopy ( C ), Scale bar= 20 μm. Nanoparticle Analysis (NTA) showing the size distribution of EVs (nm) and particle concentration (particle/ml) ( D ); Western blot of EVs markers (CD9, CD63, CD81, Tsg101) and protein co-isolate (Apolipoprotein-B) where Plasma (P) and F [ – ] = SEC Fractions collected ( E )
Techniques Used: Isolation, Clinical Proteomics, Derivative Assay, Transmission Assay, Electron Microscopy, Confocal Microscopy, Concentration Assay, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Graphical representation of workflow A . In-vitro assessment of amyloid-β (Unaggregated) and EV association. Imaging was performed at three key stages: Control (Without any stresses), Sonication only, and Sonication and agitation combined. TEM micrograph shows morphological characterization of different Aβ aggregated structures formed in the presence of EVs ( B ), Scale bar= 100 nm; CFM images for respective groups ( C )and Colocalization analysis ( D ) showed maximum PCC in the post-sonication group (PCC = 0.73). Colour yellow is the merged signal of EVs (Green) and Aβ (red). Scale bar= 20 μm. PCC between CD9-Alexa 488 EVs and AβSA-Alexa 647. Control: 0.033 ± 0.005; Sonicated: 0.780 ± 0.046; Sonicated & Agitated: 0.499 ± 0.066 ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA: p < 0.0001 (E)
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Imaging, Control, Sonication
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of interaction between EV and small amyloid-β aggregates ( A ) and big amyloid-β aggregates/Fibrils ( B ) at low temperature 4℃. The TEM, Scale bar= 100 nm;, and CFM micrograph shows the EVs sequestering the SA group as opposed to no association between BA/Fibril B . Graphical representation of workflow C . CFM image showing Alexa-Fluor-488 CD9 (Green) and Alexa-Fluor-647Amyloid-β (Red) signals of: EVs only; Aβ; and EVs and Aβ together D . Scale bar= 20 μm. Fluorescence intensity per cell was measured as Mean Fluorescence intensity/Area of ROI. Each condition included 3 cells per dish with a total of n = 9 cells per group. Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis test) indicated a significant difference ( p < 0.001) E . Cell viability ( F ) 10,000cells/well were seeded and included 4 wells per plate with a total of n = 4. Statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons showing a highly significant effect ( p < 0.00001)
Techniques Used: Comparison, Fluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: Graphical representation of workflow A . Immunohistological staining images of APP mouse brain sections with CD9 (EVs) and ThT (plaques) showing typical Amyloid- plaques with discrete CD9 signals ( B ) and respective colocalization coefficient D . In-vitro dual staining experimental images: ( C ) APP mice brain sections immunohistological staining with CD9 (antibody) and ThT stained Aβ. ( n = 3 mice brains) (Scale bar 20 μm; Zeiss Confocal microscope and NIS-Elements BR 4.30.00.64-bit fluorescence microscope). Images were captured at (For ThT; λex = 450 nm and λem = 490 nm. CD9-Rodamine TRITC-conjugated; λex = 550 nm and λem = 570 nm). Scale bar= 20 μm
Techniques Used: Staining, In Vitro, Microscopy, Fluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: Graphical representation of workflow A . Circulating sEVs derived from Control, MCI and AD patient does not show colocalization signal B . Co-incubation with Aβ SA was performed only for control and AD EVs. Controls sEVs incubated with small amyloid-β aggregates C . AD sEVs, when incubated with small amyloid-β aggregates, colocalize (White arrows) at low temperature 4℃ D . Colour Yellow is the colocalised signal for sEVs (Green)and Aβ (Red). Scale bar= 20 μm. PCC ( E ) between CD9–Alexa Fluor 488 EVs and AβSA-Alexa Fluor 647, calculated using Costes thresholding (FIJI/JACoP). Control EVs: 0.033 ± 0.005; AD EVs: 0.780 ± 0.046 ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA: p < 0.0001. Percentage of AβSA associated with EVs ( F ), Control EVs: 2.87 ± 0.90%; AD EVs: 40.37 ± 1.98% (( n = 3; incubation maintained at 4 °C)). Unpaired t-test: p < 0.0001. AD ( n = 9), MCI ( n = 3), and non-demented controls ( n = 10)
Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Control, Incubation